Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Commerce City

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 24, 1990No. 89SA418PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey

This is a direct appeal pursuant to section 13-4-102(l)(b), 6A C.R.S. (1987), challenging a decision by the Adams County District Court which held unconstitutional a portion of a Commerce City zoning ordinance. Because the complaint, filed under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), 1 was not timely filed within thirty days as required by C.R.C.P. 106(b), 2 we reverse and remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss the complaint.

I

The complaint in this case was filed by John R. Danielson (“Danielson”), individually and d/b/a Commerce City Business Center, and Commerce City Business Center,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Norby v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Collopy v. Wildlife Commission, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Higby v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CanterburySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Baker v. City of DaconoColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Wallin v. CosnerColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. JJR 1, LLC v. Mt. Crested ButteColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Crawford v. State, Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API