Legal Opinion

Howell Ex Rel. Motsinger v. Lawless

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1963No. 390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The determinative question on this appeal is whether plaintiff's evidence, considered in the light most favorable to (the defendant, contains any inference .that the plaintiff himself was guilty of contributory negligence. Wilson v. Camp, 249 N.C. 754, 107 S.E. 2d 743. If there is more than a scintilla, of such evidence, it is a matter for .the jury. Absher v. Raleigh, 211 N.C. 567, 190 S.E. 897. Plaintiff’s evidence discloses the following facts:

About 4:30 p.m. on October 14, 1961, plaintiff and defendant purchased six twelve-ounce cans of beer at a tavern. They then repaired to an ABC store…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dinkins v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Bell v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Absher v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Wilson v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Paddock v. SchuelkeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Brandon v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Jones v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Beam v. ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API