Legal Opinion

Turner v. McKee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ActioN by C. D. Turner against B. Ii. McKee, beard by Judge H. B. Bryan, at August Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of ORange County. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The Code, sec. 754, provides that “no account shall be audited by the board (of county commissioners) for any services or disbursements, unless it is first made out in items and has attached to and filed with it the affidavit of the claimant that the services therein charged have been in fact made and rendered and that no part thereof has been paid or satisfied.”

This is a very explicit and very wise provision of the lawmaking power. It is of the highest importance to the public' *252that this requirement should always and everywhere be strictly observed. The law-makers were so fully persuaded of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . HatchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. . DeytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Staton v. . WimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. State v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coble v. . ShoffnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  2. Stanley v. . BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API