Coble v. . Shoffner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The action is on a bond wherein eight per cent is named as the rate of interest, but is not expressed to be given for the loan of money as the consideration of the bond. We are to assume, therefore, that the bond was not executed for money loaned. The question is, does the penalty prescribed in Laws 1866, Battle's Revisal, chap. 114, apply to this case? That act provides:
1. That the legal rate of interest upon all sums of money (43) where interest is allowed, shall be six per cent per annum for such time as interest may accrue.
2. That for the loan of money, but upon no other account, interest…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Kidder v. . McIlhennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Hines v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State v. . SnuggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wolfe v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876