Legal Opinion
Puri v. Mansukhani
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided May 21, 1998No. 14-96-01368-CVPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMIDEI, Justice.
This is an appeal from the denial of both a special appearance and a motion for new trial after a default judgment. Appellant, Suresh K. Puri, a native of Nigeria, is a shareholder officer, and director of a Texas corporation, Alpha Impex, Inc. (Alpha). In his suit for breach of his employment contract, appellee, Rustom Mansukhani, the corporation’s president, .obtained a default judgment against appellant. Appellant alleges in thirteen points of error that the trial court erred in denying his special appearance and his motion for new trial. We affirm.
Background
Appellant…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Randall & Blake, Inc. v. Evans (In Re Canion)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Shapolsky v. Brewton, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Solutioneers Consulting, Ltd. v. Gulf Greyhound Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
- Happy Industrial Corp. v. American Specialties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. ICO, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.