Legal Opinion

State v. Carr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1930No. 22736. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

A chronological statement of the history of the proceedings in this case appears in the companion case of State v. Carr, ante p. 74, 294 Pac. 1013.

On March 20, 1930, appellant was charged in a substitute information containing four counts, under Bern. Comp. Stat., §2601-2, known as the “insufficient funds” statute. Count 1 charged grand larceny in that on October 26, 1929, appellant did willfully and feloniously, with intent to defraud, make, utter, and deliver to the Zellerbach Paper Company her check, knowing at the time of such drawing and delivering that she had not sufficient funds in,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. DevlinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. State v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. EtheridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. State v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. StevickWashington Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API