Legal Opinion

Zabin v. Picciotto

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided June 6, 2000No. 991594APublished

1Opinion of the CourtSlKORA, J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff lienholder attorneys and law firms (“the attorneys” or “the lienholders” pursuant to G.L.c. 221, §§50 and 50B) are suing the defendants Stefano Picciotto, Judith Picciotto, Melita Picciotto, Athena Picciotto, Juan Nunez, and Foreign Car Center, Inc. (Collectively the “Picciotto parties”) for collection of substantial fees and costs allegedly earned and incurred in longrunning antecedent litigation. The Picciottos have counterclaimed against the attorneys upon allegations of legal malpractice and violations of G.L.c. 93A. At this juncture the Picciottos have moved to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  2. Foley v. Polaroid Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Tetrault v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Mello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  5. Susan E. Johnson v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API