Legal Opinion

Mello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 13, 1988PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

We consider first on direct appellate review whether the evidence warranted a finding that the defendant, Stop & Shop, discharged the plaintiff Mello, an employee at will, in violation of a principle of public policy for which the law should impose liability for wrongful discharge. We conclude that the evidence did not warrant a finding that Mello was discharged in violation of such a public policy principle. Consequently, the trial judge, who has reported the propriety of his ruling for appellate consideration, erroneously denied Stop & Shop’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Agis v. Howard Johnson Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Sheets v. Teddy's Frosted Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Wright v. Shriners Hospital for Crippled ChildrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Smith-Pfeffer v. Superintendent of the Walter E. Fernald State SchoolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API