Legal Opinion

State v. Pedraza

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Emily Pines, J.

Probable Cause Hearing Decision

This decision addresses the question whether there is probable cause to believe that the respondent, Luis Pedraza, is a “sex offender requiring civil management.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 [g].) A sex offender requiring civil management is defined in article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law as “a detained sex offender who suffers from a mental abnormality.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [q].) This question arises under a proceeding commenced pursuant to the recently enacted Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act, effective April…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JuncoNew York Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. O.V.New York Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. P.H.New York Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. State v. Kevin J.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Marcello A.New York Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API