State v. Pedraza
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Emily Pines, J.
Probable Cause Hearing Decision
This decision addresses the question whether there is probable cause to believe that the respondent, Luis Pedraza, is a “sex offender requiring civil management.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.06 [g].) A sex offender requiring civil management is defined in article 10 of the Mental Hygiene Law as “a detained sex offender who suffers from a mental abnormality.” (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.03 [q].) This question arises under a proceeding commenced pursuant to the recently enacted Sex Offender Management and Treatment Act, effective April…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. JuncoNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. O.V.New York Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. P.H.New York Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- State v. Kevin J.New York Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Marcello A.New York Supreme Court · 2015