Legal Opinion
Hill v. Bonded Adjustment Ass'n, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1979No. 11784PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Associate Judge:
The issue in this case is whether the trial court abused its discretion, upon motion of plaintiff-appellant, in failing to award appellant reasonable litigation costs. Since we see nothing in the record which fulfills appellant’s heavy burden to show an abuse of discretion, we affirm.
The record shows that on February 20, 1974, appellant filed a suit against appellee alleging violations of the District of Columbia debt collection law, D.C.Code 1973, §§ 28-3813 to -3814. In pursuit of that claim, appellant twice served interrogatories on appellee, requested production of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mary Doe v. General Hospital of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- In Re BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Coleman v. Lee Washington Hauling Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Daime v. PriceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kammerman v. KammermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re BryantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Giles v. Crawford Edgewood Trenton TerraceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006