Fulghum v. Madrid
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PARKER, C. J.
A motion to strike proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, presented to the district court by appellant, has been filed by the appellee. The findings do not appear in the bill of exceptions, and are not certified to by the district judge. If they are before us, they are here as a part of the record proper, certified to by the clerk. Appended to these requested findings is an indorsement as follows:
“The foregoing findings are hereby refused and exceptions allowed before the signing- of1 the decree herein.
“Thomas D. Leib, District Judge.”
This condition…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fullen v. FullenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Sais v. City Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Baca v. PereaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Garcia v. SilvaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Tietjen v. McCoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. DohertyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Lovato v. HicksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Fulghum v. MadridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- De Lost v. Phelps Dodge Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
- Martin v. Village of Hot SpringsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.