Legal Opinion

Fulghum v. Madrid

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1927No. 3093PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

This suit was commenced May 23, 1924, to reform a mortgage and to foreclose it. The reformation sought was in the description. The true description is lot 10 and the west half of lot 11 in block B, Covey addition to the city of Raton. The property was erroneously described in the mortgage as lots 10 and 11, in block 13, of that addition.

By amended complaint, filed August 29, 1924, Richard H. Azar and Joseph Azar were made defendants; it being alleged that they claimed some right, title, and interest in the mortgaged property, but that, whatever their claim might…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Chetham-Strode v. BlakeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Fulghum v. MadridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ilfeld v. De BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State Tax Commission v. Powers & ScrogginsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Wilson v. New Mexico Lumber & Timber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Taylor v. Hanchett Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Board of Education of City of Las Vegas v. BoarmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Scheer v. StolzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API