Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Zawacki

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided February 3, 2014No. Civil Action No. 3:12-57-DCRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

This matter is pending for consideration of Plaintiffs Raleigh Bruner’s and Wildcat Moving, LLC’s motion for summary judgment. [Record No. 72] The Plaintiffs contends that they are entitled to summary judgment on their claim that the notice, protest, and hearing provisions of the Kentucky statutes applicable to moving companies, contained within KRS § 281.615 et seq., and the implementing regulations, violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. They request that the Court issue prospective injunctive relief,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Associated Builders & Contractors, E. Pa. Chapter, Inc. v. Cnty. of NorthamptonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Maze v. Ky. Judicial Conduct Comm'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Slaughter v. DobbsDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2022
  4. Tiwari v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
  5. Tiwari v. MeierDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API