Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maze v. Ky. Judicial Conduct Comm'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2019No. 2018-SC-000633-RRPublished

1Dissent

LAMBERT, J., DISSENTING:

Although I join Justice Wright's dissent regarding the necessity to file a writ to invoke our jurisdiction to hear this case, because the Majority has chosen to address the merits, I feel compelled to address them as well and respectfully dissent. I would hold that the Fifth Amendment protections afforded Judge Maze in her parallel criminal proceeding would stay the Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC) proceedings pending the outcome of her criminal charges, which are also part of the JCC complaint. Because of her fundamental constitutional rights against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API