Legal Opinion

Appeal of Silk

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 14, 2007No. 2006-461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The employee, Tina Silk, filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs in connection with her appeal to this court concerning workers’ compensation benefits. She requests an award of $8,614.50 in attorney’s fees and $508.51 in costs. The employer, Wickers Sportswear, Inc., has objected. We grant the employee’s motion.

The facts are undisputed. In 2000, a department of labor (DOL) hearing officer determined that the employee had suffered a compensable wrist injury on January 30, 2000, and ordered payment of benefits. After a subsequent hearing resulted in the employee receiving additional…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Appeal of CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Burnham v. DowningSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  5. State v. HamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Appeal of LangenfeldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. Appeal of Northridge Environmental, LLCSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  3. Petition of New Hampshire Secretary of State and New Hampshire Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. State of New Hampshire. v. John T. BrawleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018
  5. In re M.M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API