Legal Opinion

State v. Finbraaten

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1985No. C0-84-1187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal by a criminal defendant from a three year prison term imposed by the court and executed for a conviction of theft by swindle in excess of $2,500 in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(4), 3(1) (1982). Appellant Douglas Fin-braaten contends the triple durational departure and his dispositional departure was not justified by substantial and compelling circumstances and the evidence was insufficient to convict. We affirm.

FACTS

In January 1983 Lillian Bronson, age 97, lived in her Minneapolis home with a live-in aide, Joanne Chase. Chase’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. GartlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. BriggerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. O'HAGANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. SchenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  3. State v. FettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API