Legal Opinion

United States v. Mr. Hamburg Bronx Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

This is an action by the Federal Government to enforce certain tax liens which it has assessed and filed against the defendant, “Mr. Hamburg-Bronx Corporation”, for social security and income taxes, withheld by that corporation from the wages of its employees under the provisions of the tax withholding statute, T. 26 U.S.C. § 3402, formerly § 1622, and for social security taxes due from Hamburg as the employer. The Hamburg corporation had failed to pay over to the Government the taxes it withheld from its employees and failed to pay its own share of the Federal Social…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Meyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Comcoach Corporation, Debtor-Appellee, the Roslyn Savings Bank v. Comcoach CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  3. United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  4. Spivak v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Friedman v. WahrsagerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API