Legal Opinion

May Department Stores Co. v. Harryman

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 11, 1985No. 389, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The issue presented for decision on this appeal is whether an employee who parks in an area of a shopping center parking lot, which is neither owned, maintained nor controlled by her employer, and who is injured by the intentional acts of a third party, is entitled to receive worker’s compensation benefits? We hold that under the facts of this case, she is and, therefore, we will affirm the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County.

The facts are largely not in dispute. Muriel E. Harry-man, appellee, an employee of the May Department Stores Company, d/b/a the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Coffey v. Derby Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Honaker v. W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Fenwick Motor Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. SpradlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. MacGill v. Blue Cross of Maryland, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. May Department Stores Co. v. HarrymanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Schlossberg v. EpsteinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Bennett v. Baskin & SearsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API