Legal Opinion

Senesac v. Duclos

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1970No. 173-69PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

To recover a balance due on the purchase price of a truck, the plaintiff brought suit. The amount due at the time of trial came to $514.06, on a transaction originally amounting to $2,750.00. The action was commenced by a writ in the common counts, and was answered by a general denial. On- the day of trial the defendant filed a motion to dismiss, on the grounds of failure to comply with the requirements of *602the statute of registration for partnerships, associations and persons doing business in this state under any name other than their own. 11 V.S.A. § 1621.

The motion was heard below and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'BRIEN v. Comstock Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  2. Potwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
  3. Enosburg Grain Co. v. Wilder ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coty v. Ramsey Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Michael Long, Lynn Martin, Steven Goodkind and the Coalition for a Liveable City v. City of Burlington and BTC Mall Associates, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. Albert R. (Alpine) Bingham IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. Hart v. Chaves Londonderry Gravel Pit, LLCVermont Superior Court · 2010
  5. TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. Albert R. (Alpine) Bingham IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API