Spellacy v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, Acting P. J.
This is a proceeding in prohibition to restrain respondents from proceeding further with the trial of a minority stockholders’ suit, petitioner claiming to have dismissed the action under his absolute right to do so, pursuant to subdivision 1, section 581, Code of Civil Procedure, to wit: “An action may be dismissed, or a judgment of nonsuit entered, in the following cases: 1. By the plaintiff, by written request to the clerk, filed with the papers in the case ... at any time before the trial, upon payment of the costs of the clerk or justice; provided that a counterclaim has not been set up,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Waterman v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Russell v. WeyandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Huntington Park Improvement Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Loeb v. BermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by13 opinions
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Ensher v. Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- London v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.