Legal Opinion
Fox v. Murrell
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided February 26, 1993No. 2910649PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The record in this appeal is limited. Apparently the action was initiated in district court by Audrey Murrell, pro se. Murrell alleged that Carol D. Fox owed her $1,050 because, "[l]oan for auto has not been repaid in time frame given."
In lieu of an answer and counterclaim, Fox's attorney filed a two-page document apparently attempting to construct and incorporate numerous form-like pleadings, including a notice of appearance, a motion to dismiss, a motion for a more definite statement, and a motion to strike. That document also states that Fox "EXPRESSLY RETAINS any and all rights to amend…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Brannon v. BrannonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- City of Birmingham v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Tidwell v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- McArdle v. BromfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Landers v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Walker v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- CAM Investments, LLC v. TottyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
- Crowe v. Interstate Safety Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Landers v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007