Legal Opinion

Himovitz v. Justice's Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1926No. Docket No. 5211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.

An original application is made to this court in this case for writ of prohibition for the purpose of prohibiting the respondent, a justice of the peace, from hearing and deciding a case pending before him as such justice. The ease was within the jurisdiction of the Justice’s Court, and jurisdiction over the person of defendant had been legally obtained. A default had been duly entered in said case and a judgment thereon for plaintiff had been duly entered on January 17, 1924. The defendant in that action mov'ed to set aside the default and judgment on January-30, 1924. Said justice granted…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Valentine v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lindley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Alexander v. CrollottSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Boghosian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. North Central Services, Inc. v. HafdahlMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. North Central Services, Inc. v. HafdahlMontana Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API