Himovitz v. Justice's Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, J.
An original application is made to this court in this case for writ of prohibition for the purpose of prohibiting the respondent, a justice of the peace, from hearing and deciding a case pending before him as such justice. The ease was within the jurisdiction of the Justice’s Court, and jurisdiction over the person of defendant had been legally obtained. A default had been duly entered in said case and a judgment thereon for plaintiff had been duly entered on January 17, 1924. The defendant in that action mov'ed to set aside the default and judgment on January-30, 1924. Said justice granted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex parte OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Valentine v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lindley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McAneny v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Alexander v. CrollottSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Boghosian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- North Central Services, Inc. v. HafdahlMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- North Central Services, Inc. v. HafdahlMontana Supreme Court · 1981