Legal Opinion

Purvis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2007No. 27681PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

A jury convicted Appellant Scott Purvis (“Movant”) of driving while intoxicated. He was placed on probation, but violated it, and was sent to prison. His Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion was denied after ev-identiary hearing. His appeal therefrom raises two points stemming from a jury note sent less than two hours into its deliberations, asking: “Do we have to be unanimous1 in our decision. If so this cannot be accomplished.” The trial court and counsel discussed how to respond:

THE COURT: Now, they have only been out since 3:20. They are going to have the same problem…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. TolliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  2. Ervin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Tilley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Melillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Wright v. BlevinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API