Purvis v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.
A jury convicted Appellant Scott Purvis (“Movant”) of driving while intoxicated. He was placed on probation, but violated it, and was sent to prison. His Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion was denied after ev-identiary hearing. His appeal therefrom raises two points stemming from a jury note sent less than two hours into its deliberations, asking: “Do we have to be unanimous1 in our decision. If so this cannot be accomplished.” The trial court and counsel discussed how to respond:
THE COURT: Now, they have only been out since 3:20. They are going to have the same problem…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. TolliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Ervin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. BurnsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Tilley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Melillo v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Wright v. BlevinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012