Legal Opinion

Staplins v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 13, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiff’s decedent was a guest in an automobile owned and operated by Frank McManus, since deceased, which came into collision with an automobile owned by the defendant William B. Waterman, Incorporated, and operated by the defendant Murphy, resulting in his death. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant Durant, administrator of McManus’ estate, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the other defendants.

The plaintiff alleges error in the denial of her motion to set these verdicts aside, also errors in the charge of the court. The jury might reasonably have found…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Latham v. HankeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. James v. Von SchuckmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Meyer v. HartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Riordan v. GouinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  5. Nirenstein v. SachsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  3. State v. EdwardsConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
  4. McGran v. Meymarian'sConnecticut Superior Court · 1953
  5. McGran v. Meymarian'sPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API