Legal Opinion
State Highway Department v. Stunkard
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 28, 1946No. 15,781PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
This is a workmen’s compensation case. Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as the Highway Department, the Fund and the Commission, respectively, and defendant in error as Stunkard. The Fund carried the industrial insurance of the Highway Department.
On March 6, 1940 Stunkard, while employed by the Highway Department, met with an accident arising out of and in the course of that employment and was injured. Six days later he was sent by his foreman to a doctor for attention and the accident was reported to the Commission. That report was received March 22, and the Fund notified.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frank v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
- Jones v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Bonfils v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tucker v. in Death of GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Valenzuela v. MERCY HOSPITAL, DENVER, COLORADOColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Brofman v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
- Eight Thousand West Corporation v. StewartColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Greene v. Green Acres Construction Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.