Legal Opinion
Brofman v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 14, 1947No. 15,899PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Luxford
This is an industrial commission case. Harry Brof-man, plaintiff in error, is hereinafter designated as claimant, and we will refer to defendants in error, the Industrial Commission of Colorado, City and County of Denver, and State Compensation Fund, as the commission, the employer and the insurance carrier respectively.
December 28, 1935, claimant, a Denver police officer, fell and bruised his hip in alighting from a radio car. The accident arose out of and in the course of his employment. January 3, 1936, he went to Denver General Hospital, was treated for his injury, and returned to work…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer & Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Industrial Commission v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- City of Sacramento v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. OrthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Ball v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Harlan v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Loffland Bros. Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals PanelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.