Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 19, 1975No. 29,802PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ferguson, Senior Judge:

Tried by a general court-martial convened by the Commanding General, 82d Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, the appellant was found guilty of two specifications of larceny and one specification of transferring a forged check in violation of Articles 121 and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 921 and 923. This appeal questions whether the substitution of a military judge after arraignment without a showing of good cause deprives the court-martial of jurisdiction to proceed with the case.

Two preliminary sessions were held…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. KnudsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. GrowUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. Petty v. Convening AuthorityUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. BoysenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. MetcalfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. HawkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. DixonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. CozadU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. DixonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API