In the Interest of A.B.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BOWES, J.:
The guardian ad litem appointed to represent B.B., A.B., and M.B. in the underlying dependency proceedings appeals from the juvenile court’s orders denying Lancaster County Children and Youth Social Service Agency’s (“CYS”) request to change the children’s permanency goals from reunification to adoption.1 We affirm.
B.B., A.B., and M.B., three girls, were born of KB.’s (“Mother”) relationships with three separate men. B.B.’s father was identified as J.R.; however, A.B.’s and M.B.’s fathers are unknown. None of the men has had any significant contact with their respective…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Interest of R.J.T.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Jaiguay v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Cady v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- In Re Ex Rel. H.S.W.C.-B & S.E.C.-BSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In re N.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.