Legal Opinion
Bond v. Fulcomer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 3, 1989No. 88-1279PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.
Richard Bond, a state prisoner, appeals the dismissal of a federal habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254d(l) (1982). The district court, adopting the report and recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate, concluded that since Bond failed to meet the exhaustion of state remedies requirement of Duckworth v. Serrano, 454 U.S. 1, 102 S.Ct. 18, 70 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982); 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b), (c), he was not eligible for federal relief.
We conclude that Bond’s petition for abo-catur to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, albeit untimely and denied…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Tyrone Werts v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Philadelphia the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Joseph Nara v. Frederick FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Lisa Michelle Lambert v. Charlotte Blackwell, Mrs., Superintendent the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Fahy v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Gary Lee Doctor v. Gilbert A. WaltersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.