Legal Opinion

In Re Kiley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 3, 2011No. SJC-10767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

The issue raised on appeal is whether a judge abused his discretion by ordering the named partner of a law firm to enter an appearance on behalf of a plaintiff in a civil case where the plaintiff had entered into a contingent fee agreement with the law firm, the law firm attorney who had filed an appearance on behalf of the plaintiff decided to leave the practice of law temporarily, the client could not find successor counsel, and discovery was behind schedule. We conclude that, in these circumstances, the judge did not abuse his discretion in ordering another attorney from the law firm to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zabin v. PicciottoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  2. Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  4. Herbits v. Constitution Indemnity Co. of PhiladelphiaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Munger Chadwick, P.L.C. v. Farwest Development & Construction of the Southwest, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Faircloth v. DiLilloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Miller v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. In re YelenaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. LNV Corp. v. DuzanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API