Legal Opinion

Faircloth v. DiLillo

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 5, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGants, J.

General Laws c. 231, § 60B (§ 60B), provides that “[e]very action for malpractice, error or mistake against a provider of health care shall be heard by a tribunal consisting of *121a single justice of the superior court, a physician licensed to practice medicine in the commonwealth . . . , and an attorney authorized to practice law in the commonwealth.” Where a medical malpractice tribunal determines that there is not sufficient evidence to raise a legitimate question of a defendant’s liability appropriate for judicial inquiry, “the plaintiff may pursue the claim through the usual judicial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Assessor of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Little v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. LockleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Perez v. BAY STATE AMBULANCE & HOSP. RENTAL SERV. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Washington v. CranmerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  2. Polanco v. SandorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Washington v. CranmerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API