Legal Opinion

Christianson v. Conrad-Houston Insurance

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2014No. 6868 S-14305PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Senior Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

When Keith Jones sued Todd Christianson for severe personal injuries Jones suffered while working for Christianson's landscaping business, Christianson tendered his defense to his general liability insurer. It did not accept his tender. It instead sent him a letter that told him he should defend himself and that discussed an exclusion for claims of employees. Christianson then began to incur *393defense expenses. No insurer on the policies obtained by Christianson's insurance broker, Conrad-Houston Insurance (CHI), ever defended him in Jones's…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. International Mobiles Corp. v. Corroon & Black/Fairfield & Ellis, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  3. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. 2002 Lawrence R. Buchalter Alaska Trust v. Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  3. Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Jones v. WestbrookAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Janice L. Park v. Jessica J. SpaydAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API