Robotic Vision Systems, Inc. v. Cybo Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
By Decision and Order dated March 20, 1993, the Court granted the motion by plaintiff Robotic to dismiss counts I, III and IV of the defendant’s answer and counterclaims for failure to satisfy the particularity requirement set forth in Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). On April 23, 1993, the defendant Cybo Systems, Inc. filed an amended answer and counterclaims. The plaintiff now moves to dismiss counts VIII (replevin) and IX (conversion) of the amended answer and counterclaims, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), on the ground that these two counts fail to state a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gregory Branum v. Clifford Clark, David Hanson, Paul Szarmach, George Stein, and Ross GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Mark Labounty v. Stephen G. Adler, E. Carrillo, Walter A. Burdge, J. Grigioni, and All Program Committee MembersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Celsius Network Limited v. StoneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022