Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Soble

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1982No. Docket 57219PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. L. Tahvonen, J.

In this action for damages, plaintiffs claimed they were induced to enter into a consent judgment by fraud on the part of defendant’s decedent, Harold Soble. Following a lengthy non-jury trial, the trial court found for plaintiffs and defendant now appeals as of right.

As is often true in fraud actions, the legal issues before this Court cannot be considered apart from a detailed statement of the factual setting from which they spring. With due but necessarily passing regard for the virtues of brevity, that statement follows.

In 1967, Harold Soble purchased two adjoining parcels of real…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Higgins v. LawrenceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Williams v. American Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Platsis v. EF Hutton & Co. Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
  2. Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Harriman v. MaddocksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. State-William Partnership v. GaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Boyd v. Sachs (In Re Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API