Legal Opinion

Harriman v. Maddocks

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 2, 1986PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

In this action arising out of a motor vehicle collision, plaintiffs Doyle Harriman and his wife, Cindy Harriman, appeal the summary judgment entered by the Superi- or Court (Waldo County) in favor of defendant Harlan M. Maddocks. Finding, contrary to the Superior Court’s conclusion, that the case involves one or more genuine issues of material fact, we vacate that summary judgment. Since the case must go back for further proceedings, we also now review the Superior Court’s pretrial order that granted only in part the Harrimans’ motion for discovery of the entire case…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. APL Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1980
  4. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Transamerica InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1972
  5. Hawkins v. District Court in & for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. National Tank Co. v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. STATE EX REL. ALLSTATE INS. v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Francis v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. Mueller v. Penobscot Valley HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API