Legal Opinion

Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

In the trial of this action before the court and a jury the following facts were disclosed: The decedent, Cornelius J. Murphy, consulted a physician of his own choosing, the defendant Keen, who advised a cystoscopy and recommended hospitalization at the defendant hospital, a private, non-charitable institution. The decedent entered the hospital on July 2, 1937, and soon thereafter was prepared for the operation. A nurse in the hospital’s employ was in charge of the operating room. When Dr. Keen was ready to perform the cystoscopy he asked the nurse for a five per cent solution of cocaine,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Sheehan v. North Country Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Robertson v. Charles B. Towns HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  5. Hendrickson v. HodkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bing v. ThunigNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Rice v. California Lutheran HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Necolayff v. Genesee HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Post v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API