Izaguirre v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of capital murder by a jury and received a sentence of life imprisonment. He appeals that conviction alleging two grounds of error: that the trial court improperly admitted a photograph of the victim into evidence, and that there is insufficient evidence to support the conviction.
Appellant’s first ground of error asserts that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence an 8 X 10 inch black and white photograph depicting the head of the victim after the pathologist had opened the scalp during the autopsy to expose the damage to the skull from bullet wounds.…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Wygal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Paulus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Holladay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moreno Denoso v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- State v. Lara, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Villegas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- Sandow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.