Legal Opinion

Bosh v. Fahey

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1981PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

The Appellate Division concluded that, in computing a family’s entitlement to public assistance benefits, the Department of Social Services must disregard any OASDI (Old-Age, Survivors’ and Disability Insurance) benefits received by a family member between the ages of 18 and 22 who is currently attending school on a full-time basis. This conclusion was based, in part, upon an “Action Transmittal —Interpretation” issued by the Department of Health and Welfare which…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Wasservogel v. MeyerowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. MTR. OF RODRIGUEZ v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. BanjomanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Owens v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Hernandez v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Summers v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API