Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Blum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The narrow issue presented in these two appeals is the legal effect of an Action Transmittal issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services upon the New York State Department of Social Services computations for determining eligibility for Medicaid.

An Action Transmittal is a bulletin authorized by Federal regulations (45 CFR 201.3 [d]) and sent to State agencies by the Department of Health and Human Services to advise them of current Federal policy and depart*510mental views regarding the proper interpretation and application of the public assistance laws…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Bosh v. FaheyNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Martin v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Haley v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Two Associates v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. International Union of Painters & Allied Trades, Dist. Council No. 4 v. New York State Dept. of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Palmer v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API