Redlich Mfg. Co. v. John H. Rice & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
In Equity. Action by the Redlich Manufacturing Company against John H. Rice & Co. On motion for appointment of a special master to assess damages for the wrongful issuance of an injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.
[1-3] In this case the District Court granted a preliminary injunction in July, 1912, but the Court of Appeals disapproved the order, and accordingly it was dissolved on March 8, 1913. The plaintiff had given security, conditioned to ‘‘indemnify the said defendants for all damages which may be sustained by reason of said injunction”; and the pending motion asks the immediate appointment of a special master to ascertain these damages. The plaintiff objects, on the ground that the motion is premature, because the evidence has not yet been heard and a final decree…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Tyler Min. Co. v. Last Chance Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Coosaw Min. Co. v. Farmers' Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1892
- Lea v. DeakinUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
- Lehman v. McQuownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lawrence v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. BellamyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1914
- Stoody Co. v. MikelsDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1941