Nordstrom, Inc. v. Tampourlos
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, C.J.
G. James Tampourlos and Lillian M. Tampourlos, husband and wife, and Gloria's Schools of Beauty, Inc., a Washington corporation, (hereinafter Tam-pourlos) appeal the trial court's judgment enjoining them from (1) naming their hair salon "Nostrum, The Styling Salon", (2) using the name "Phase II", (3) publicizing their salon as "formerly the Nordstrom Styling Salon", and dismissing their claim of retaliatory eviction, and awarding of attorney's fees to Nordstrom, Inc., under the Consumer Protection Act. We affirm the injunction and the dismissal and reverse the award of attorney's fees.
Facts
In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
- Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Lightfoot v. MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. TampourlosWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Olson Kundig Inc v. 12th Avenue Iron IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022