Legal Opinion

Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. Bettis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1937No. 26871PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURST, T.

The defendant, Tess Bettis, had occupied for several years 'an 80-acre tract of land under a year-to-year agricultural lease executed by the owner of the land. In August, 1932, the owner executed to Bettis a renewal agricultural lease covering the whole 80 acres for the year 1933. On November 23, 1932, the owner then executed an oil and gas lease covering the whole 80 acres to T. W. Meazel and others. Thereafter, on May 1, 1933, Meazel et al. executed to the plaintiff an assignment of the oil and gas lease in so far as it covered the south 60 acres of the premises, and the assignee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karns v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Long v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Hennessy v. Wilmerding-Loewe Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1900

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Margay Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Superior Construction Co. v. ElmoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API