Legal Opinion
Frankel v. Kurtz
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided March 25, 1965No. Civ. A. 4611PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56, Fed.Rules of Civ.Proc., initiated January 7, 1965, attacking, as part of the basis therefor, plaintiff’s complaint, and plaintiff’s following motion to amend under Rule 15 (a), induce present consideration in this forum.
Significant allegations of the original complaint read:
“That prior to August 25, 1963, plaintiff was invited by her daughter, the defendant, to visit in her home for the purpose of attending social events leading up to the marriage of plaintiff’s grandson, who is defendant’s son, on September 1,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. KoikeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Lester R. Cooper and Allstate Insurance Company v. American Employers' Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sims v. GilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Neil v. ByrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- South Carolina Department of Social Services v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Chrisley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
- Cunningham v. JaffeDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.