Legal Opinion

Neil v. Byrum

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 1986No. 22536PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

In this slip and fall case, the appellant contends that the trial judge erred in not granting her motion for a directed verdict. We agree and reverse.

Appellant agreed to let her niece and nephew have a surprise party for their father at her house. Respondent, one of the guests at the party, fell from the top of the back steps. The brick steps are approximately three and a half feet high and do not have a barrier or railing on either side. Because there is no landing at the top of the steps, it is impossible to stand on the top step and open the back door. Rather than stepping…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Skipper v. HartleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  3. House v. European Health SpaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  4. Frankel v. KurtzDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1965
  5. Smiley v. Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sims v. GilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Goode v. St. Stephens United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Landry v. Hilton Head Plantation Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Manning v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API