Legal Opinion

St. Paul Abstract Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1929No. 342PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review a decision of the Board of Tax *226Appeals, -which sustained the income tax against petitioner. The basis of petitioner’s objection to the levy of the tax is that it is not subject thereto, because it is a “personal service corporation,” within the meaning of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057, 1059).

Two questions are presented here — the first, a matter of procedure; the second, the application of section 200 of the Revenue Act of 1918.

I. The Board of Tax Appeals made extended findings of fact concerning the business of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Denver Live Stock Com'n Co. v. Com'r of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  3. FEEDERS'SUPPLY CO. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Cuyahoga Abstract Title & Trust Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Twin City Tile & M. Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  2. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. ShaneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. American Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. McGee v. NeeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  5. Hatch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API