Legal Opinion
Stolte v. Laird
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 1972No. Civ. A. 1764-70PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.
This action, initiated as a habeas corpus petition, seeks review of the constitutionality of plaintiffs’ convictions of certain offenses by general military court-martial. The case is now before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment.
Plaintiffs are two former members of the United States Army, draftees, who were stationed in February, 1968, at Fort Ord, California. 1 That installation served, inter alia, as a basic training center for new troops. On or about the evening of February 21, 1968, plaintiffs distributed at Fort Ord…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark Avrech v. The Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. New v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- DeChamplain v. McLucasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Committee for G. I. Rights v. CallawayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
- Carlson v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.