Committee for G. I. Rights v. Callaway
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GESELL, District Judge.
This is a class action brought on behalf of all G.I.’s attached to the United States Army’s European Command. Plaintiffs claim that certain features of a drug abuse prevention plan developed by the Army for that command are unconstitutional and they seek a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief.
The issues have been narrowed and clarified during several pretrial proceedings. Plaintiffs have abandoned damage claims. The Army published a revised comprehensive statement of the plan on September 10, 1973, which reflected a reevaluation of the program…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Committee for Gi Rights v. Honorable Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Stokes v. United States, Immigration & Nat. Serv.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Raymond G. Dechamplain v. Col. Hewitt E. Lovelace, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. KinneerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. RuizUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1974