Doe v. City of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
This matter came before the Court on November 28, 2011, on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ second cause of action, and DENIED with regards to the remaining claims.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Jane Doe and Anne Raskin, (“Doe” and “Raskin” or “Plaintiffs”), employees of Defendant City and County of San Francisco Department of Emergency Communications (“DEC”),…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cagno v. Supreme Mortgage Lending, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Jaekel v. Aytu BioScience, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Wasche v. Orchard HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020