Legal Opinion

Doe v. City of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 13, 2011No. C10-04700 TEHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

This matter came before the Court on November 28, 2011, on a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants City and County of San Francisco (“CCSF”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs’ second cause of action, and DENIED with regards to the remaining claims.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Jane Doe and Anne Raskin, (“Doe” and “Raskin” or “Plaintiffs”), employees of Defendant City and County of San Francisco Department of Emergency Communications (“DEC”),…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cagno v. Supreme Mortgage Lending, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
  2. Jaekel v. Aytu BioScience, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
  3. Wasche v. Orchard HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API