Jaekel v. Aytu BioScience, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ROBERT DAVID JAEKEL, Case No. 20-cv-00340-TSH 9 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 10 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 AYTU BIOSCIENCE, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, for 16 Summary Adjudication (“Motion for Summary Judgment”) filed by Defendants Aytu Bioscience, 17 Inc. (“Aytu”), Jarrett Disbrow, and Josh Disbrow (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 31. On 18 July 21, 2022, Plaintiff Robert Jaekel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Jose Flores v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.