Legal Opinion

Coppage v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2011No. 20110076PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ernest Coppage appeals from an order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Coppage argues the district court erred in dismissing his application and he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing because there were genuine issues of material fact about his ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel claim. We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

I

[¶ 2] In 2006, Coppage was charged with attempted murder. Before trial, the district court issued preliminary jury instructions to the parties including the essential elements of attempted murder and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Klose v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Vandeberg v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ude v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Peterka v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Chatman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Coppage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Coppage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API